Local operating-model alignment analysis

Best Franchise Opportunities We Assessed in Bronx, New York

We compared 14 franchise concepts for Bronx, New York. Local business demand was a leading positive mechanism. Route and curb productivity pressure was a leading operating constraint.

What “best” means in this ranking“Best” means the strongest modeled local operating alignment among the franchise concepts assessed on this page. It does not estimate earnings or determine which franchise is best for a particular candidate.
Analysis by Thomas Jepsen, MSc Model: 0.9.0
View the ranking Read the methodology
14Concepts evaluated
29Sources used
20Primary sources
33Local metrics

Evaluation set

Why these concepts were evaluated

This is not a ranking of every franchise that may be offered in the city.

14Concepts assessed

Concepts were included when enough operating-model information existed to assign a provisional local-sensitivity profile. Unresolved inputs reduce confidence or remain conditional rather than automatically excluding a concept.

A brand’s participation in our referral network does not add points or change its position.

City-level conclusions

What stood out in our assessment

Highest category average (limited comparison)Restoration

66.6 average across 2 concepts

Largest positive factorTarget-market demand

1.1 points average among 12 affected concepts

Largest negative factorLabor and staffing friction

1.5 points average reduction among 13 affected concepts

Most assumption-sensitive rankPillar To Post Home Inspectors

Tested rank range spans 5 positions

Executive conclusion

What the ranking means for Bronx, New York

City Wide, ActionCOACH, and Jan-Pro International produced the highest modeled local-alignment scores in the evaluated set. Local business demand was the strongest positive scored mechanism among 10 exposed concepts, adding 1.1 points on average. Route and curb productivity pressure was the broadest operating constraint, reducing exposed concepts by 1.1 points on average. ZOOM DRAIN was especially relationship-sensitive: removing route and curb productivity pressure moved it from #12 to #9 in the full model rerun. These scores describe local operating alignment, not expected returns or overall franchise quality; the offered territory and franchise economics still require separate diligence.

How this differs from a directory: the model does not award points for brand popularity, advertising placement, or referral compensation. It tests how documented local conditions interact with each concept’s operating requirements.

Best franchise opportunities assessed

Top 10 local-alignment scores from 14 concepts assessed

“Best” refers to modeled local operating alignment among the concepts assessed—not expected earnings, franchise-system quality, or candidate fit.

Rankings use full-precision scores.Displayed values use one decimal place. Identical displayed scores can therefore have different ranks, and close results should be treated as effectively similar.
RankFranchiseAlignment and tierLargest advantageLargest constraintEvidence confidence
1City WideFacility managementInvestment: $229,729–$410,730
73.8Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+3.5 ptsTarget-market demand -0.4 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence
2ActionCOACHBusiness coachingInvestment: $71,668–$303,513
72.3Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+2.0 ptsTarget-market demand -0.2 ptsTerritory quality Moderate evidence confidence
3Jan-Pro InternationalCommercial cleaningInvestment: $130,000–$421,500
70.1Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+2.9 ptsTarget-market demand -1.7 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence
4FASTSIGNSSigns and graphicsInvestment: $231,226–$386,285
70.1Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+2.5 ptsTarget-market demand -0.8 ptsTerritory quality Moderate evidence confidence
5HomeSmilesProperty maintenance servicesInvestment: $148,110–$201,800
69.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+1.7 ptsTarget-market demand -1.2 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence
6Tiger AdjustersPublic insurance adjustingInvestment: $43,050–$159,500
68.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.3 ptsTarget-market demand -0.5 ptsTransportation, routing, and parking Moderate evidence confidence
7Pillar To Post Home InspectorsHome inspectionInvestment: $102,690–$134,290
68.3Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.2 ptsProperty replacement-cycle demand -1.0 ptsTransportation, routing, and parking Moderate evidence confidence
8Rainbow International RestorationRestorationInvestment: $185,336–$351,900
66.7Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.6 ptsReferral ecosystem -2.0 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence
9PuroCleanRestorationInvestment: $54,575–$262,145
66.4Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.6 ptsReferral ecosystem -1.9 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence
10Mister Sparky ElectricElectrical
66.3Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+1.0 ptsProperty replacement-cycle demand -2.5 ptsLabor and staffing friction Moderate evidence confidence

View all 14 score calculations

Conditions that changed the analysis

What mattered most in Bronx, New York

01

Dense resident and business base supports broad local commercial demand without establishing uniform walk-in traffic

This relationship affected 10 concepts and added 1.1 points on average among those exposed. Local evidence: Employer establishments, employer employment, annual payroll, and nonemployer establishments: employer establishments 2023: 18,674; employer employment 2023: 285,540; annual payroll 2023 usd: 15,984,872,000; nonemployer establishments 2022: 136,151 counts and usd. [4]

02

Truck-route, parkway, curb, bus-lane, and commercial-parking rules constrain vehicle-based operations

This relationship affected 14 concepts and reduced 1.1 points on average among those exposed. Local evidence: Active bus lanes restrict goods delivery and are subject to automated enforcement: goods delivery in active bus lane permitted: no; fine range usd: 50, 250; citywide loading zones announced minimum: 500; buses with automated enforcement announced minimum: 1,000 rule summary and counts. [15] [16] [13] [14]

03

asset-light-b2b

This operating-model cluster separated from the broader set because its exposure to local support and constraints differed. The strongest positive factor was target-market demand, while the main constraint was labor and staffing friction. [8] [4] [7] [26] [9] [25] [27] [10] [3] [22]

Evidence behind the city mechanisms

Dense resident and business base supports broad local commercial demand without establishing uniform walk-in traffic1 modeled effect
Local business demandTarget-market demand
Predominantly multifamily stock and elevated serious-code-violation incidence support building-system service demand and complexity3 local facts · 2 modeled effects · 3 sources
  • Estimated housing units on July 1, 2025: 583,114 housing units [4]
  • Housing tenure and structure profile: renter occupied share: 80; multi unit structure share: 89; housing units: 574,059 percent and units [5]
  • Serious housing-code violations per 1,000 privately owned rental units in 2025: 271.5 violations per 1000 privately owned rental units [6]
Replacement and repair demandProperty replacement-cycle demand
Legacy-system service complexityLabor and staffing friction
Construction and maintenance wage levels indicate skilled-trade staffing pressure1 modeled effect
Skilled-trade labor competitionLabor and staffing friction
Truck-route, parkway, curb, bus-lane, and commercial-parking rules constrain vehicle-based operations1 modeled effect
Route and curb productivity pressureTransportation, routing, and parking
Low retail availability and elevated corridor asking rents raise fixed-location site burden1 modeled effect
Fixed-location occupancy cost pressureReal estate and site feasibility
Large-building emissions rules create threshold-gated compliance burden and retrofit demand3 local facts · 2 modeled effects · 3 sources
  • Local Law 97 covered-building size thresholds: single building gross sqft over: 25,000; same tax lot combined gross sqft over: 50,000; same condominium board combined gross sqft over: 50,000; first emissions limits year: 2,024; stricter limits year: 2,030 square feet and years [18]
  • Local Law 97 noncompliance penalty formulas: article 320 late report usd per sqft per month: 0.5; article 320 excess emissions usd per metric ton per year: 268; article 321 late report usd: 10,000; article 321 compliance failure usd: 10,000 usd penalty formulas [19]
  • Housing tenure and structure profile: renter occupied share: 80; multi unit structure share: 89; housing units: 574,059 percent and units [5]
Facility compliance burdenRegulatory and operating friction
Energy-retrofit service demandProperty replacement-cycle demand
Large Bronx healthcare systems support institutional service demand while creating role-specific labor and campus-containment considerations3 local facts · 3 modeled effects · 3 sources
  • Health care and social assistance receipts or revenue in 2022: 17,269,742,000 usd [4]
  • Bronx hospital and health-system economic and employment scale: economic activity usd: 16,758,000,000; jobs supported: 67,000; payroll expenditures usd: 6,074,000,000 usd and jobs [28]
  • Montefiore Einstein network scale and Bronx campus presence: employees minimum: 40,000; patients annually minimum: 1,100,000; patient interactions annually minimum: 7,700,000; specialty care locations minimum: 300; named bronx campuses: Moses, Hutchinson, Einstein, Wakefield, Westchester Square network totals and named locations [27]
Healthcare institutional service demandTarget-market demand
Healthcare-overlap labor competitionLabor and staffing friction
Campus-contained consumer demandTarget-market demand
Healthcare, public-sector, and institutional buyers support referral opportunities but can require formal procurement3 local facts · 2 modeled effects · 3 sources
  • Employer establishments, employer employment, annual payroll, and nonemployer establishments: employer establishments 2023: 18,674; employer employment 2023: 285,540; annual payroll 2023 usd: 15,984,872,000; nonemployer establishments 2022: 136,151 counts and usd [4]
  • Health care and social assistance receipts or revenue in 2022: 17,269,742,000 usd [4]
  • New York City agency opportunities use PASSPort and related vendor-registration and notice systems: passport required for contracting actions: yes; pip required for payment: yes; public opportunities browsable: yes; vendor enrollment may require approval time: yes; solicitations over 100000 advertised in city record: yes process summary [25] [26]
Professional and institutional relationship densityReferral ecosystem
Institutional procurement-cycle frictionSales and customer acquisition

Compare all assessed concepts

Local impact by franchise concept

14 concepts shown. Expand a concept to see the score-changing factors and their modeled drivers; the full audit ledger stays collapsed.

#1Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment73.8

City Wide

Facility management · B2B facility management and vendor coordination

Initial investment: $229,729–$410,730

Increase +3.5 pts Target-market demandReduction -0.4 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Stable

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Target-market demand
  • Local business demand Evidence+2.3 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #1
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+1.2 pts
+3.5 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.8 pts
+0.8 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.4 pts
-0.4 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.1 pts
-0.1 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.1 pts
-0.1 pts
Net local movement+3.76 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+3.5
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.4
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.1
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Referral ecosystem+0.8
Territory quality-0.1
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score73.76
Published local-market alignment73.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +3.5 pts
Tested rank range
#1–#2
#2Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.3

ActionCOACH

Business coaching · home-based B2B advisory

Initial investment: $71,668–$303,513

Increase +2.0 pts Target-market demandReduction -0.2 pts Territory quality

Rank sensitivity: Stable

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Target-market demand
  • Local business demand Evidence+1.9 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #2
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+0.1 pts
+2.0 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.7 pts
+0.7 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.2 pts
-0.2 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.1 pts
-0.1 pts
Sales and customer acquisitionInstitutional procurement-cycle friction EvidenceConditional — applicability must be confirmedNot scored
Net local movement+2.32 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.0
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionEffect below the publication threshold
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.1
Real estate and site feasibilityEffect below the publication threshold
Sales and customer acquisitionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Referral ecosystem+0.7
Territory quality-0.2
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score72.32
Published local-market alignment72.3

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.0 pts
Tested rank range
#1–#2
#3Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.1

Jan-Pro International

Commercial cleaning · recurring commercial route service

Initial investment: $130,000–$421,500

Increase +2.9 pts Target-market demandReduction -1.7 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Target-market demand
  • Local business demand Evidence+2.0 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #3 → #6
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+0.8 pts
+2.9 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-1.7 pts
-1.7 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.5 pts
-0.5 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.2 pts
+0.2 pts
Net local movement+0.15 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
1 image
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.9
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-1.7
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.7
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Referral ecosystem+0.2
Territory quality-0.5
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.15
Published local-market alignment70.1

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.9 pts
Tested rank range
#3–#7
#4Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.1

FASTSIGNS

Signs and graphics · B2B production and installation center

Initial investment: $231,226–$386,285

Increase +2.5 pts Target-market demandReduction -0.8 pts Territory quality

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Target-market demand
  • Local business demand Evidence+2.1 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #4 → #7
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+0.4 pts
+2.5 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.8 pts
-0.8 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Real estate and site feasibility
  • Fixed-location occupancy cost pressure Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.6 pts
-0.6 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.4 pts
+0.4 pts
Net local movement+0.08 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Item 19 — Financial Performance Representation
2 images
Public company data assessed
3 sources
YouTube video 1YouTube video 2YouTube video 3
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.5
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.6
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.7
Real estate and site feasibility-0.7
Sales and customer acquisitionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Referral ecosystem+0.4
Territory quality-0.8
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.08
Published local-market alignment70.1

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.5 pts
Tested rank range
#3–#6
#5Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment69.8

HomeSmiles

Property maintenance services · Home-based mobile property-maintenance franchise using equipped service vans and technician crews to deliver bundled…

Initial investment: $148,110–$201,800

Increase +1.7 pts Target-market demandReduction -1.2 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Stable

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Target-market demand
  • Local business demand Evidence+1.2 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #5 → #3
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+0.4 pts
+1.7 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.8 pts
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.5 pts
-1.2 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.7 pts
+0.7 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.6 pts
-0.6 pts
Net local movement-0.19 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+1.7
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-1.2
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.6
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.7
Territory quality-0.7
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score69.81
Published local-market alignment69.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +1.7 pts
Tested rank range
#4–#5
#6Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment68.8

Tiger Adjusters

Public insurance adjusting · Home-based, referral-led public insurance adjusting business combining local property inspections with…

Initial investment: $43,050–$159,500

Increase +0.3 pts Target-market demandReduction -0.5 pts Transportation, routing, and parking

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.5 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #6
-0.5 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.4 pts
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.1 pts
-0.5 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.4 pts
-0.4 pts
Target-market demand+0.3 pts
Net local movement-1.19 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 19 — Financial Performance Representation
1 image
Public company data assessed
1 source
YouTube video 1
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.3
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.5
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.5
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-0.4
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score68.81
Published local-market alignment68.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Transportation, routing, and parking -0.5 pts
Tested rank range
#3–#6
#7Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment68.3

Pillar To Post Home Inspectors

Home inspection · mobile property inspection service

Initial investment: $102,690–$134,290

Increase +0.2 pts Property replacement-cycle demandReduction -1.0 pts Transportation, routing, and parking

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-1.0 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #7
-1.0 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.6 pts
-0.6 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.4 pts
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.1 pts
-0.4 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.2 pts
+0.2 pts
Target-market demand+0.2 pts
Net local movement-1.70 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 19 — Financial Performance Representation
1 image
Public company data assessed
2 sources
YouTube video 1YouTube video 2
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.2
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.2
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.4
Transportation, routing, and parking-1.0
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-0.6
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score68.30
Published local-market alignment68.3

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Transportation, routing, and parking -1.0 pts
Tested rank range
#5–#10
#8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment66.7

Rainbow International Restoration

Restoration · emergency property restoration

Initial investment: $185,336–$351,900

Increase +0.6 pts Referral ecosystemReduction -2.0 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Labor and staffing friction
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.9 pts
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.9 pts
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.2 pts
-2.0 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-1.6 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #8
-1.6 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.6 pts
+0.6 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.3 pts
+0.3 pts
Target-market demand
  • Healthcare institutional service demand Evidence+0.2 pts
+0.2 pts
Net local movement-3.26 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.2
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-2.0
Transportation, routing, and parking-1.6
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.6
Territory quality-0.7
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score66.74
Published local-market alignment66.7

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Labor and staffing friction -2.0 pts
Tested rank range
#8–#10
#9Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment66.4

PuroClean

Restoration · emergency property restoration

Initial investment: $54,575–$262,145

Increase +0.6 pts Referral ecosystemReduction -1.9 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-0.9 pts
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.8 pts
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.2 pts
-1.9 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-1.8 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #9 → #10
-1.8 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.6 pts
+0.6 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.3 pts
+0.3 pts
Net local movement-3.60 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demandNot applicable to this operating model
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-1.9
Transportation, routing, and parking-1.8
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.6
Territory quality-0.7
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score66.40
Published local-market alignment66.4

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Labor and staffing friction -1.9 pts
Tested rank range
#9–#11
#10Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment66.3

Mister Sparky Electric

Electrical · skilled-trade home service

Increase +1.0 pts Property replacement-cycle demandReduction -2.5 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-2.0 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #10 → #8
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.5 pts
-2.5 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-1.5 pts
-1.5 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Energy-retrofit service demand Evidence+0.6 pts
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.3 pts
+1.0 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Net local movement-3.74 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demandNot applicable to this operating model
Property replacement-cycle demand+1.0
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-2.5
Transportation, routing, and parking-1.5
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-0.7
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score66.26
Published local-market alignment66.3

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Labor and staffing friction -2.5 pts
Tested rank range
#8–#12
#11Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment66.2

Aire Serv

HVAC installation, repair, and maintenance · Manager-led mobile HVAC installation, repair, maintenance, and emergency service business using skilled technicians…

Initial investment: $113,308–$271,708

Increase +0.9 pts Property replacement-cycle demandReduction -2.6 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-2.0 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #11 → #9
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.5 pts
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.2 pts
-2.6 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-1.8 pts
-1.8 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Energy-retrofit service demand Evidence+0.5 pts
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.4 pts
+0.9 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.7 pts
-0.7 pts
Target-market demand+0.4 pts
Net local movement-3.80 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
1 image
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Item 19 — Financial Performance Representation
1 image
Public company data assessed
1 source
YouTube video 1
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.4
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.9
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-2.6
Transportation, routing, and parking-1.8
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-0.7
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score66.20
Published local-market alignment66.2

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Labor and staffing friction -2.6 pts
Tested rank range
#7–#12
#12Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment66.0

ZOOM DRAIN

Drain and sewer service · emergency skilled-trade route service

Initial investment: $266,250–$570,500

Increase +0.5 pts Referral ecosystemReduction -2.3 pts Transportation, routing, and parking

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-2.3 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #12 → #9
-2.3 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-1.8 pts
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.4 pts
-2.3 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.8 pts
-0.8 pts
Referral ecosystem
  • Professional and institutional relationship density Evidence+0.5 pts
+0.5 pts
Target-market demand+0.4 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.4 pts
+0.4 pts
Net local movement-4.03 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.4
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.4
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-2.3
Transportation, routing, and parking-2.3
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.5
Territory quality-0.8
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score65.97
Published local-market alignment66.0

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Transportation, routing, and parking -2.3 pts
Tested rank range
#9–#13
#13Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment65.6

Mr. Rooter

Plumbing · scheduled and emergency skilled-trade service

Initial investment: $152,900–$298,675

Increase +0.4 pts Property replacement-cycle demandReduction -2.3 pts Labor and staffing friction

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Labor and staffing friction
  • Skilled-trade labor competition Evidence-1.9 pts
  • Legacy-system service complexity Evidence-0.5 pts
-2.3 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-2.1 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: rank stays #13
-2.1 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-0.8 pts
-0.8 pts
Property replacement-cycle demand
  • Replacement and repair demand Evidence+0.4 pts
+0.4 pts
Target-market demand+0.3 pts
Net local movement-4.42 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.3
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.4
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-2.3
Transportation, routing, and parking-2.1
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-0.8
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score65.58
Published local-market alignment65.6

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Labor and staffing friction -2.3 pts
Tested rank range
#12–#14
#14Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment64.6

Workout Anytime

Fitness · fixed-location membership fitness

Initial investment: $1,060,850–$1,840,550

No material positive local adjustment identifiedReduction -1.5 pts Real estate and site feasibility

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

Why it ranks here

Score-changing local factors only. Evidence links open the underlying city finding.

Local factorModeled driversImpact
Real estate and site feasibility
  • Fixed-location occupancy cost pressure Evidence-1.5 pts
    Primary modeled driverRelationship test: #14 → #12
-1.5 pts
Territory quality
  • Territory and submarket uncertainty Evidence-1.4 pts
-1.4 pts
Target-market demand
  • Discretionary-spending pressure Evidence-1.3 pts
-1.3 pts
Labor and staffing friction
  • Frontline labor pressure Evidence-0.9 pts
-0.9 pts
Transportation, routing, and parking
  • Route and curb productivity pressure Evidence-0.2 pts
-0.2 pts
Net local movement-5.43 pts

Net uses full-precision effects; displayed factor and driver rows are rounded.

Franchise evidence

Source material assessed

Item 3 — Litigation
1 image
Item 6 — Other Fees
1 image
Item 7 — Estimated Initial Investment
2 images
Item 12 — Territory
1 image
Item 20 — Outlets and Franchise Information
1 image
Full calculation and evidence confidence

Audit layer

Full factor ledger

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand-1.3
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.9
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.2
Real estate and site feasibility-1.5
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot included in the score
Territory quality-1.4
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score64.57
Published local-market alignment64.6

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Real estate and site feasibility -1.5 pts
Tested rank range
#11–#14

Worked score example

How we calculated City Wide

This example uses the same ledger shown for every concept and must reconcile exactly to the published score.

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not mistaken for a score-changing effect.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+3.5
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing friction-0.4
Transportation, routing, and parking-0.1
Real estate and site feasibilityNot applicable to this operating model
Sales and customer acquisitionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Referral ecosystem+0.8
Territory quality-0.1
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score73.76
Published local-market alignment73.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Starting pointThe operating-model baseline shown in the first ledger row.
InteractionsAny interaction or gate is included in the relevant contribution or calibration row.
Confidence treatmentEvidence confidence is disclosed separately unless the model definition explicitly applies a calibration adjustment.
RoundingFull-precision contributions are summed before the final displayed score is rounded to one decimal place; whole-number results are shown without a trailing decimal.

Factor impact

Which local conditions changed scores or rankings?

We neutralized one factor at a time, recalculated every score, and then measured both absolute score movement and changes in rank order.

Observed model effectPositive local support

Target-market demand

We tested how much of the city’s theoretical customer and business demand remained usable after operating friction.

Why concepts react differently

We applied a measurable adjustment to 12 of 14 concepts. When we neutralized the factor and recalculated the table, 11 concepts changed position. Jan-Pro International moved from #3 to #7, the largest movement among concepts directly affected by this factor.

Concepts adjusted12 of 14
Average among affected+1.1 pts
Average across all concepts+0.9 pts
Concepts changing rank11

What we observed

  • Resident Population Estimate On July 1, 20251,406,332 people
  • Population Density In 202034,920.2 people per square mile
  • Employer Establishments, Employer Employment, Annual Payroll, And Nonemployer Establishmentsemployer establishments 2023: 18,674; employer employment 2023: 285,540; annual payroll 2023 usd: 15,984,872,000; nonemployer establishments 2022: 136,151 counts and usd

Concepts helped most

City WideFacility management
+3.5 pts
Jan-Pro InternationalCommercial cleaning
+2.9 pts
FASTSIGNSSigns and graphics
+2.5 pts
ActionCOACHBusiness coaching
+2.0 pts
HomeSmilesProperty maintenance services
+1.7 pts

Concepts challenged most

Workout AnytimeFitness
-1.3 pts
Measured but not differentiating in this concept set
  • Competitive environmentNo material score adjustment
  • Sales and customer acquisitionNo material score adjustment
  • Regulatory and operating frictionNo material score adjustment

Rank stability

Which positions depend most on individual assumptions?

The line shows the best and worst rank reached when one factor was removed from every concept. A narrow range indicates a more stable position.

#1 City WideStable · tested #1–#2
#2 ActionCOACHStable · tested #1–#2
#3 Jan-Pro InternationalHighly sensitive · tested #3–#7
#4 FASTSIGNSModerately sensitive · tested #3–#6
#5 HomeSmilesStable · tested #4–#5
#6 Tiger AdjustersModerately sensitive · tested #3–#6
#7 Pillar To Post Home InspectorsHighly sensitive · tested #5–#10
#8 Rainbow International RestorationModerately sensitive · tested #8–#10
#9 PuroCleanModerately sensitive · tested #9–#11
#10 Mister Sparky ElectricHighly sensitive · tested #8–#12
#11 Aire ServHighly sensitive · tested #7–#12
#12 ZOOM DRAINHighly sensitive · tested #9–#13
#13 Mr. RooterModerately sensitive · tested #12–#14
#14 Workout AnytimeModerately sensitive · tested #11–#14

Neutralizing a factor removes it from every concept. A concept can move down even when its own score improves because competitors may benefit more.

Original factor comparison

How each factor affected the highest-rated franchise concepts

The graph includes the top 14 concepts by local-alignment score. Only nonzero score contributions are plotted. A factor is removed when every displayed concept received 0.0 points from it. Hover or focus a concept name to highlight all of its remaining data points.

Factor impact among the highest-rated franchise conceptsDiverging dot plot showing nonzero factor score contributions for the top 14 concepts. Zero-point concept-factor pairs are omitted, and factors with no nonzero contributions are excluded.+3.5+1.80.0-1.8-3.5
Target-market demand
#1 City Wide · Target-market demand · +3.5 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Target-market demand · +2.0 pts2#3 Jan-Pro International · Target-market demand · +2.9 pts3#4 FASTSIGNS · Target-market demand · +2.5 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Target-market demand · +1.7 pts5#6 Tiger Adjusters · Target-market demand · +0.3 pts6#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Target-market demand · +0.2 pts7#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Target-market demand · +0.2 pts8#11 Aire Serv · Target-market demand · +0.4 pts11#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Target-market demand · +0.4 pts12#13 Mr. Rooter · Target-market demand · +0.3 pts13#14 Workout Anytime · Target-market demand · -1.3 pts14
Property replacement-cycle demand
#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.2 pts7#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts8#9 PuroClean · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts9#10 Mister Sparky Electric · Property replacement-cycle demand · +1.0 pts10#11 Aire Serv · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.9 pts11#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.4 pts12#13 Mr. Rooter · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.4 pts13
Labor and staffing friction
#1 City Wide · Labor and staffing friction · -0.4 pts1#3 Jan-Pro International · Labor and staffing friction · -1.7 pts3#4 FASTSIGNS · Labor and staffing friction · -0.6 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Labor and staffing friction · -1.2 pts5#6 Tiger Adjusters · Labor and staffing friction · -0.5 pts6#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Labor and staffing friction · -0.4 pts7#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Labor and staffing friction · -2.0 pts8#9 PuroClean · Labor and staffing friction · -1.9 pts9#10 Mister Sparky Electric · Labor and staffing friction · -2.5 pts10#11 Aire Serv · Labor and staffing friction · -2.6 pts11#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Labor and staffing friction · -2.3 pts12#13 Mr. Rooter · Labor and staffing friction · -2.3 pts13#14 Workout Anytime · Labor and staffing friction · -0.9 pts14
Transportation, routing, and parking
#1 City Wide · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.1 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.1 pts2#3 Jan-Pro International · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.7 pts3#4 FASTSIGNS · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.7 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.6 pts5#6 Tiger Adjusters · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.5 pts6#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Transportation, routing, and parking · -1.0 pts7#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Transportation, routing, and parking · -1.6 pts8#9 PuroClean · Transportation, routing, and parking · -1.8 pts9#10 Mister Sparky Electric · Transportation, routing, and parking · -1.5 pts10#11 Aire Serv · Transportation, routing, and parking · -1.8 pts11#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Transportation, routing, and parking · -2.3 pts12#13 Mr. Rooter · Transportation, routing, and parking · -2.1 pts13#14 Workout Anytime · Transportation, routing, and parking · -0.2 pts14
Real estate and site feasibility
#4 FASTSIGNS · Real estate and site feasibility · -0.7 pts4#14 Workout Anytime · Real estate and site feasibility · -1.5 pts14
Referral ecosystem
#1 City Wide · Referral ecosystem · +0.8 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Referral ecosystem · +0.7 pts2#3 Jan-Pro International · Referral ecosystem · +0.2 pts3#4 FASTSIGNS · Referral ecosystem · +0.4 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Referral ecosystem · +0.7 pts5#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Referral ecosystem · +0.6 pts8#9 PuroClean · Referral ecosystem · +0.6 pts9#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Referral ecosystem · +0.5 pts12
Territory quality
#1 City Wide · Territory quality · -0.1 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Territory quality · -0.2 pts2#3 Jan-Pro International · Territory quality · -0.5 pts3#4 FASTSIGNS · Territory quality · -0.8 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Territory quality · -0.7 pts5#6 Tiger Adjusters · Territory quality · -0.4 pts6#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Territory quality · -0.6 pts7#8 Rainbow International Restoration · Territory quality · -0.7 pts8#9 PuroClean · Territory quality · -0.7 pts9#10 Mister Sparky Electric · Territory quality · -0.7 pts10#11 Aire Serv · Territory quality · -0.7 pts11#12 ZOOM DRAIN · Territory quality · -0.8 pts12#13 Mr. Rooter · Territory quality · -0.8 pts13#14 Workout Anytime · Territory quality · -1.4 pts14
Primary source records by factorTarget-market demand: [4] [5] [6] [7] [10] [27] [28] [1]Property replacement-cycle demand: [5] [6] [18] [19] [1]Competitive environment: [4] [7] [10] [3]Labor and staffing friction: [8] [9] [6] [27] [28] [1] [2]Transportation, routing, and parking: [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [3]Real estate and site feasibility: [7] [10] [11] [13] [20] [21] [22] [23] [1]Sales and customer acquisition: [4] [25] [26] [27] [28] [7]Referral ecosystem: [4] [27] [28] [25] [26]Territory quality: [4] [7] [10] [12] [17] [22] [3]Regulatory and operating friction: [9] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [2] [3]
View the chart data as a table
ConceptTarget-market demandProperty replacement-cycle demandLabor and staffing frictionTransportation, routing, and parkingReal estate and site feasibilityReferral ecosystemTerritory quality
#1 City Wide+3.5 pts—-0.4 pts-0.1 pts—+0.8 pts-0.1 pts
#2 ActionCOACH+2.0 pts——-0.1 pts—+0.7 pts-0.2 pts
#3 Jan-Pro International+2.9 pts—-1.7 pts-0.7 pts—+0.2 pts-0.5 pts
#4 FASTSIGNS+2.5 pts—-0.6 pts-0.7 pts-0.7 pts+0.4 pts-0.8 pts
#5 HomeSmiles+1.7 pts—-1.2 pts-0.6 pts—+0.7 pts-0.7 pts
#6 Tiger Adjusters+0.3 pts—-0.5 pts-0.5 pts——-0.4 pts
#7 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors+0.2 pts+0.2 pts-0.4 pts-1.0 pts——-0.6 pts
#8 Rainbow International Restoration+0.2 pts+0.3 pts-2.0 pts-1.6 pts—+0.6 pts-0.7 pts
#9 PuroClean—+0.3 pts-1.9 pts-1.8 pts—+0.6 pts-0.7 pts
#10 Mister Sparky Electric—+1.0 pts-2.5 pts-1.5 pts——-0.7 pts
#11 Aire Serv+0.4 pts+0.9 pts-2.6 pts-1.8 pts——-0.7 pts
#12 ZOOM DRAIN+0.4 pts+0.4 pts-2.3 pts-2.3 pts—+0.5 pts-0.8 pts
#13 Mr. Rooter+0.3 pts+0.4 pts-2.3 pts-2.1 pts——-0.8 pts
#14 Workout Anytime-1.3 pts—-0.9 pts-0.2 pts-1.5 pts—-1.4 pts

Interpretation

How to interpret the result

City Wide, ActionCOACH, Jan-Pro International led because their operating requirements captured more of the local support from target-market demand while remaining less exposed to labor and staffing friction. The same city condition can help one operating model and constrain another, so score differences should be read through each concept's factor pattern rather than as a universal franchise-quality verdict. The ordering is most assumption-sensitive for Jan-Pro International, Pillar To Post Home Inspectors, Mister Sparky Electric; their ranks move more widely when individual factors are neutralized.

Category comparisons

Best franchise categories we assessed in Bronx, New York

Category summaries are shown only when at least two concepts qualified. Two-concept comparisons are explicitly labeled as limited.

Limited two-concept comparison

Best Restoration franchise opportunities we assessed in Bronx, New York

66.6

2 Restoration concepts qualified for comparison, with scores ranging from 66.4 to 66.7. Rainbow International Restoration ranked highest at 66.7. Referral ecosystem added 0.6 points on average among the affected concepts. Labor and staffing friction reduced the exposed concepts by 2 points on average.

Interpret cautiously: A 0.3-point spread is too small to support a strong brand-level conclusion from city alignment alone.

Concepts compared
2
Score range
66.4–66.7
Category average
66.6
Rainbow International Restoration66.7
PuroClean66.4

Metric registry

The 33 local metrics behind this analysis

The registry shows each public metric’s raw value, period, geography, source, and its actual role in the compiled analysis.

View all local metrics
MetricRaw valuePeriodGeographyRole in analysisSource
Resident population estimate on July 1, 20251,406,332peopleJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkUsed in scoring [4]
Population change from the April 2020 estimate base to July 2025-4.5percentJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkContext only [4]
Population density in 202034,920.2people per square mileJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkUsed in scoring [4]
Land area42.17square milesJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkContext only [4]
Estimated housing units on July 1, 2025583,114housing unitsJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkSupports modeled relationship [4]
Housing units authorized by building permits in 20256,032housing unitsJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkContext only [4]
Housing tenure and structure profilerenter occupied share: 80; multi unit structure share: 89; housing units: 574,059percent and units2024 American Community Survey 1-year and 5-year estimates as labeledBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkSupports modeled relationship [5]
Rental vacancy and median gross rent indicatorsrental vacancy rate: 2.4; median gross rent 2025 dollars: 1,510; median recent mover rent 2025 dollars: 1,780percent and usd per monthHousing and neighborhood indicators through 2025, with 2024 ACS rent and housing valuesBronx, New YorkUsed in scoring [6]
Renter households spending more than 50 percent of household income on rent in 202435.8percent of renter householdsHousing and neighborhood indicators through 2025, with 2024 ACS rent and housing valuesBronx, New YorkUsed in scoring [6]
Serious housing-code violations per 1,000 privately owned rental units in 2025271.5violations per 1000 privately owned rental unitsHousing and neighborhood indicators through 2025, with 2024 ACS rent and housing valuesBronx, New YorkUsed in scoring [6]
Employer establishments, employer employment, annual payroll, and nonemployer establishmentsemployer establishments 2023: 18,674; employer employment 2023: 285,540; annual payroll 2023 usd: 15,984,872,000; nonemployer establishments 2022: 136,151counts and usdJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkUsed in scoring [4]
Health care and social assistance receipts or revenue in 202217,269,742,000usdJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkUsed in scoring [4]
Retail and accommodation-and-food-service sales in 2022retail sales usd: 11,798,408,000; accommodation and food services sales usd: 1,979,761,000usdJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkContext only [4]
Median household income and persons in povertymedian household income usd: 48,676; persons in poverty percent: 28.7usd and percentJuly 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permitsBronx borough / Bronx County, New YorkUsed in scoring [4]
Observed Bronx storefront vacancy rate as of April 15, 20268percent of storefrontsObserved storefront status through April 15, 2026Bronx, New YorkUsed in scoring [7]
Storefront vacancy varied materially within the Bronxhutchinson metro center percent: 18.6; areas reported above 10 percent: Mott Haven, Crotona, Eastchester; persistent vacancy areas: Concourse, Claremont Village, Crotona, Eastchester, Pelham Gardens, Kingsbridge, Norwoodpercent and named areasObserved storefront status through April 15, 2026Selected Bronx neighborhoods and commercial corridorsUsed in scoring [7]
Bronx retail availability and asking rents in Q1 2026availability rate percent: 7.31; average asking rent usd psf year: 64.89; fordham road asking rent usd psf year: 125.22; inventory sqft: 31,325,105percent usd per sqft and sqftQ1 2026Bronx retail market; Fordham Road corridorUsed in scoring [10]
Current industrial-market indicators do not establish borough-wide critical scarcitybronx vacancy rate percent: 8.6; bronx ytd net absorption sqft: -634,096; outer borough average asking rent usd psf year: 27.5percent sqft and usd per sqftQ2 2026Bronx industrial submarket and New York outer-borough industrial marketContext only [11]
Selected major occupational-group mean hourly wages compared with national averagesall occupations: metro: 41.5, united states: 33.54; food preparation and serving: metro: 22.22, united states: 17.86; building and grounds: metro: 23.02, united states: 19.66; sales: metro: 36.03, united states: 26.43; office and administrative: metro: 28.72, united states: 24.79; construction and extraction: metro: 39.49, united states: 31.42; installation maintenance and repair: metro: 34.5, united states: 30.44; transportation and material moving: metro: 27.92, united states: 23.96usd per hourMay 2025New York-Newark-Jersey City metropolitan statistical areaUsed in scoring [8]
New York City minimum wage effective January 1, 202617usd per hourEffective January 1, 2026New York CityUsed in scoring [9]
Montefiore Einstein network scale and Bronx campus presenceemployees minimum: 40,000; patients annually minimum: 1,100,000; patient interactions annually minimum: 7,700,000; specialty care locations minimum: 300; named bronx campuses: Moses, Hutchinson, Einstein, Wakefield, Westchester Squarenetwork totals and named locationsCurrent institutional figures displayed August 2026Montefiore Einstein network with major Bronx campusesSupports modeled relationship [27]
Bronx hospital and health-system economic and employment scaleeconomic activity usd: 16,758,000,000; jobs supported: 67,000; payroll expenditures usd: 6,074,000,000usd and jobsData mainly from 2024 New York hospital cost reports and 2023 regional multipliersBronx County, New YorkSupports modeled relationship [28]
Truck movements are constrained by the designated truck-route network and parkway prohibitionstruck route network required: yes; parkways generally prohibit trucks: yes; off route destination access: nearest permissible routerule summaryCurrent rules accessed August 2026New York City truck network and Bronx roadwaysUsed in scoring [12]
Commercial-vehicle curb and overnight parking rulesgeneral maximum street parking hours: 3; residential street prohibition start: 21:00; residential street prohibition end: 05:00; hunts point ibz overnight pilot: yeshours and rule summaryCurrent rules and pilot locations accessed August 2026New York City; Hunts Point Industrial Business Zone in the BronxUsed in scoring [13] [14]
Active bus lanes restrict goods delivery and are subject to automated enforcementgoods delivery in active bus lane permitted: no; fine range usd: 50, 250; citywide loading zones announced minimum: 500; buses with automated enforcement announced minimum: 1,000rule summary and countsCurrent rules accessed August 2026New York City bus lanes and loading zonesUsed in scoring [15] [16]
Tolls apply when eligible Bronx-origin commercial routes enter Manhattan's congestion-relief zonesmall commercial vehicle peak toll usd: 9; small commercial vehicle overnight toll usd: 2.25; truck peak toll range usd: 14.4, 21.6usd per entryToll schedule active August 2026Manhattan congestion-relief zone for routes originating in the BronxUsed in scoring [17]
Local Law 97 covered-building size thresholdssingle building gross sqft over: 25,000; same tax lot combined gross sqft over: 50,000; same condominium board combined gross sqft over: 50,000; first emissions limits year: 2,024; stricter limits year: 2,030square feet and yearsCompliance beginning in 2024; 2026 Covered Buildings List published March 2026Covered buildings in the Bronx under New York City lawSupports modeled relationship [18]
Local Law 97 noncompliance penalty formulasarticle 320 late report usd per sqft per month: 0.5; article 320 excess emissions usd per metric ton per year: 268; article 321 late report usd: 10,000; article 321 compliance failure usd: 10,000usd penalty formulasPenalty formulas current August 2026Buildings subject to Local Law 97 Articles 320 and 321Supports modeled relationship [19]
Business signs are governed by construction, zoning, special-district, and historic-district rulespermit generally required unless painted or smaller than sqft: 6; zoning district controls size location projection and illumination: yes; special district and historic district rules may apply: yesrule summary and square feetCurrent zoning and permit guidance accessed August 2026Business premises in the BronxConditional relationship [20]
Tier A street frontage rules apply blank-wall and ground-floor parking restrictions to designated frontagesblank wall restrictions: yes; ground floor parking restrictions: yes; applies to development or ground floor enlargement: yes; change of use rules separately apply: yesrule summaryCurrent Zoning Resolution accessed August 2026Applicable Tier A street frontages in Bronx commercial and paired manufacturing districtsConditional relationship [21]
The Special City Island District imposes localized use, height, setback, and sign controlsspecial sign controls: yes; special setback controls: yes; height controls: yes; use limitations: yesrule summaryCurrent Zoning Resolution accessed August 2026Special City Island District, BronxUsed in scoring [22]
Commercial Waste Zones are fully implemented across Bronx East and Bronx Westfully implemented date: 2025-12-01; authorized carter contract required: yes; assignment at maximum allowable rate if no contract: yesdate and rule summaryRollout status current August 2026All commercial establishments in Bronx East and Bronx WestContext only [23] [24]
New York City agency opportunities use PASSPort and related vendor-registration and notice systemspassport required for contracting actions: yes; pip required for payment: yes; public opportunities browsable: yes; vendor enrollment may require approval time: yes; solicitations over 100000 advertised in city record: yesprocess summaryCurrent procurement platform accessed August 2026New York City agencies serving or buying in the BronxSupports modeled relationship [25] [26]

How to use the ranking

What the model can and cannot establish

  • Scores measure local operating alignment, not expected financial performance or franchise-system quality.
  • Citywide evidence may not describe the exact site or territory ultimately offered.
  • Conditional effects are shown for diligence but do not change the published score until their applicability is established.

Methodology

How the local-alignment ranking is calculated

01

Measure the city

Collect reusable local metrics with source, period, geography, and confidence fields.

02

Profile each operating model

Map each franchise to controlled operating attributes and local sensitivities.

03

Apply scoreable effects

Score only effects whose applicability is established at the report’s current geographic and operating scope.

04

Preserve conditional effects

Keep location- or territory-dependent issues visible for diligence without automatically changing the score.

05

Test rank sensitivity

Remove one factor at a time from every concept and rerank using full-precision scores.

06

Generate public output

Create the ranking, factor-status ledger, visuals, metric registry, and automated quality report from the same data.

How the common baseline becomes a city-specific score

Every concept starts from the same 70.0 reference point, so differences come only from modeled local interactions. In this city, City Wide reached 73.76 after target-market demand +3.5 pts, referral ecosystem +0.8 pts, labor and staffing friction -0.4 pts, territory quality -0.1 pts, and transportation, routing, and parking -0.1 pts. The current model caps total local movement at ±18.0 points. The score is not a percentage, probability, or estimate of investment quality.

Precision and materiality

Calculations use full-precision values. Published scores and factor contributions display one decimal place, while ranks use full precision. Effects smaller than 0.1 points are identified as below the publication threshold rather than presented as a meaningful zero.

Score tiers

Tier 1 · Strongest modeled alignment80.0–100.0
Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.0–<80.0
Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment64.0–<72.0
Tier 4 · Higher-friction modeled alignment0.0–<64.0

How factor rows are classified

Positive local adjustmentNegative local adjustmentMeasured; no meaningful local adjustmentEffect below the publication thresholdNot applicable to this operating modelDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating conditionNot included in the score
What “best” means here

“Best” means the strongest modeled local operating alignment among the franchise concepts assessed on this page.

Model 0.9.0 · Compiler 0.15.1-franchise-image-filter · Report generated August 19, 2026 (site timezone)

Model governance

How this report is calculated and corrected

Calculation controls

Model designer
Thomas Jepsen

No concept’s final score is manually raised or lowered after calculation. Before this template is activated, the report is reviewed for source scope, classification, arithmetic, unsupported claims, duplication, and readability.

Model history

  1. Model 0.9.0-calibration · August 19, 2026Added compiler-derived decision intelligence and observation usage mapping., Changed factor sensitivity and channel counterfactuals to full model reruns., Added data-dependent city content signals while preserving legacy public report fields., and Added model-owned semantic compatibility gates and backward-compatible channel-level evidence attribution.

Corrections policy

Corrected source, geography, or operating-profile evidence triggers a full compiler rerun so every dependent score and visual is recalculated.

Source registry

Evidence represented in this report

Each source identifies its period, scope, and the claims or metrics it supports. Internal or supplied research is clearly distinguished from publicly accessible evidence.

  1. 1
    United States Structural Inefficiency and CRE Arbitrage AuditInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.
    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    Undated supplied research reviewed August 4, 2026
    Scope
    Bronx section within a multi-city research docket
    Locator
    Bronx, New York section, extracted paragraphs 76-84
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  2. 2
    Jurisdictional Friction and Structural Capital Constraints: A Forensic Audit of Municipal Operating EnvironmentsInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.
    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    Undated supplied research reviewed August 4, 2026
    Scope
    Bronx section within a multi-jurisdiction municipal audit
    Locator
    Section 9, Bronx, New York, extracted paragraphs 264-291
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  3. 3
    Franchise data - 2 - riverside through charlotteInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.
    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    Neighborhood research table reviewed August 4, 2026
    Scope
    Six Bronx neighborhood records
    Locator
    Rows for City Island, Fordham, Mott Haven, Kingsbridge, Morris Park, and Belmont
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  4. 4
    QuickFacts: Bronx County, New York

    Used for: Resident population estimate on July 1, 2025, Population change from the April 2020 estimate base to July 2025, Population density in 2020, Land area, and Estimated housing units on July 1, 2025

    Publisher
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Data period
    July 1, 2025 population and housing estimates; 2020-2024 ACS; 2022 economic metrics; 2025 building permits
    Scope
    Bronx County, New York, coterminous with Bronx borough
    Locator
    Population, housing, economy, income, commuting, and geography table
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  5. 5
    Bronx borough, Bronx County, NY - Profile data

    Used for: Housing tenure and structure profile

    Publisher
    Census Reporter using U.S. Census Bureau data
    Data period
    2024 American Community Survey 1-year and 5-year estimates as labeled
    Scope
    Bronx borough and Bronx County, New York
    Locator
    Housing units, occupancy, tenure, structure type, population, and income profile
    Source tier
    Tier 2 · recognized institutional research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  6. 6
    The Bronx

    Used for: Rental vacancy and median gross rent indicators, Renter households spending more than 50 percent of household income on rent in 2024, and Serious housing-code violations per 1,000 privately owned rental units in 2025

    Publisher
    NYU Furman Center
    Data period
    Housing and neighborhood indicators through 2025, with 2024 ACS rent and housing values
    Scope
    Bronx borough
    Locator
    Housing stock, rental vacancy, rent, severe rent burden, and housing-code violation indicators
    Source tier
    Tier 2 · recognized institutional research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  7. 7
    Who's Minding the Storefronts? An Analysis of Storefront Vacancies in New York City

    Used for: Observed Bronx storefront vacancy rate as of April 15, 2026 and Storefront vacancy varied materially within the Bronx

    Publisher
    Office of the New York City Comptroller
    Published
    June 4, 2026
    Data period
    Observed storefront status through April 15, 2026
    Scope
    New York City, boroughs, neighborhoods, and storefront corridors
    Locator
    Executive Summary, borough vacancy rates, neighborhood findings, and persistent-vacancy findings
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  8. 8
    Occupational Employment and Wages in New York-Newark-Jersey City — May 2025

    Used for: Selected major occupational-group mean hourly wages compared with national averages

    Publisher
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Published
    June 5, 2026
    Data period
    May 2025
    Scope
    New York-Newark-Jersey City metropolitan statistical area, including Bronx County
    Locator
    Table A major occupational groups and metropolitan-area definition
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  9. 9
    New York State's Minimum Wage

    Used for: New York City minimum wage effective January 1, 2026

    Publisher
    State of New York
    Data period
    Effective January 1, 2026
    Scope
    New York City wage-rate area
    Locator
    Minimum Wage Rate Schedule
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  10. 10
    Q1 2026 Bronx Retail Leasing Market Report

    Used for: Bronx retail availability and asking rents in Q1 2026

    Publisher
    RM Friedland
    Data period
    Q1 2026
    Scope
    Bronx retail market and named retail corridors
    Locator
    Borough inventory, availability, asking rent, and Fordham Road asking rent
    Source tier
    Tier 3 · credible industry
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  11. 11
    New York Outer Boroughs Industrial MarketBeat Q2 2026

    Used for: Current industrial-market indicators do not establish borough-wide critical scarcity

    Publisher
    Cushman & Wakefield
    Data period
    Q2 2026
    Scope
    Bronx industrial submarket and New York outer-borough industrial market
    Locator
    Bronx vacancy and absorption; outer-borough asking-rent summary
    Source tier
    Tier 3 · credible industry
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  12. 12
    Truck Routing

    Used for: Truck movements are constrained by the designated truck-route network and parkway prohibitions

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Transportation
    Data period
    Current rules accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City truck-route network
    Locator
    Truck Route Network, local and through routes, destination access, and parkway restrictions
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  13. 13
    Parking a Truck or Commercial Vehicle

    Used for: Commercial-vehicle curb and overnight parking rules

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Transportation
    Data period
    Current rules and pilot locations accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City, including the Hunts Point Industrial Business Zone pilot area
    Locator
    Commercial-vehicle curb rules and overnight-parking pilot
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  14. 14
    Parking Rules and Regulations

    Used for: Commercial-vehicle curb and overnight parking rules

    Publisher
    NYC311
    Data period
    Current rules accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City streets
    Locator
    Commercial-vehicle time limit and residential overnight-parking prohibition
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  15. 15
    Bus Lanes

    Used for: Active bus lanes restrict goods delivery and are subject to automated enforcement

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Transportation
    Data period
    Current rules accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City bus lanes
    Locator
    Permitted movements, delivery restrictions, and fine schedule
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  16. 16
    NYC DOT Announces Expansion of Loading Zones and Automated Enforcement

    Used for: Active bus lanes restrict goods delivery and are subject to automated enforcement

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Transportation
    Published
    March 28, 2024
    Data period
    Loading-zone and automated-enforcement expansion announced in 2024
    Scope
    New York City
    Locator
    Loading-zone count and automated camera enforcement expansion
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  17. 17
    Congestion Relief Zone Tolling

    Used for: Tolls apply when eligible Bronx-origin commercial routes enter Manhattan's congestion-relief zone

    Publisher
    NYC311 and Metropolitan Transportation Authority
    Data period
    Toll schedule active August 2026
    Scope
    Manhattan congestion-relief zone; relevant to Bronx-origin routes entering the zone
    Locator
    Zone geography, time periods, small commercial vehicle and truck tolls
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  18. 18
    LL97 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction

    Used for: Local Law 97 covered-building size thresholds

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Buildings
    Data period
    Compliance beginning in 2024; 2026 Covered Buildings List published March 2026
    Scope
    Covered buildings in New York City, including covered Bronx properties
    Locator
    Covered-building thresholds, compliance pathways, filing requirements, and 2026 CBL
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  19. 19
    LL97 GHG Emissions Violations

    Used for: Local Law 97 noncompliance penalty formulas

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Buildings
    Data period
    Penalty formulas current August 2026
    Scope
    Buildings subject to Local Law 97 Articles 320 and 321
    Locator
    Violations for noncompliance
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  20. 20
    Installing a Business Sign: A Step-by-Step Guide

    Used for: Business signs are governed by construction, zoning, special-district, and historic-district rules

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Buildings
    Data period
    Current zoning and permit guidance accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City with zoning-, special-district-, and historic-district variation
    Locator
    Permit threshold and commercial-district sign-size, placement, and illumination rules
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  21. 21
    Zoning Resolution Sections 32-30 and 32-31: Streetscape and Tier A Street Frontage Regulations

    Used for: Tier A street frontage rules apply blank-wall and ground-floor parking restrictions to designated frontages

    Publisher
    New York City Department of City Planning
    Data period
    Current Zoning Resolution accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Designated Tier A frontages in applicable commercial and paired manufacturing districts
    Locator
    Sections 32-30, 32-31, 32-311, and 32-312
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  22. 22
    Special City Island District

    Used for: The Special City Island District imposes localized use, height, setback, and sign controls

    Publisher
    New York City Department of City Planning
    Data period
    Current Zoning Resolution accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Special City Island District, Bronx
    Locator
    Sections 112-00 through 112-07, including special controls on signs, setbacks, height, and uses
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  23. 23
    Commercial Waste Zones Rollout Schedule and Info Sessions

    Used for: Commercial Waste Zones are fully implemented across Bronx East and Bronx West

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Sanitation
    Data period
    Rollout status current August 2026
    Scope
    All Bronx commercial establishments in Bronx East and Bronx West zones
    Locator
    Phase 2 implementation status and contract requirement
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  24. 24
    Commercial Waste Zones: What You Need to Do

    Used for: Commercial Waste Zones are fully implemented across Bronx East and Bronx West

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Sanitation
    Data period
    Current compliance process accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Implemented New York City commercial-waste zones
    Locator
    Zone identification, quote comparison, maximum-price calculation, and contracting steps
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  25. 25
    About PASSPort

    Used for: New York City agency opportunities use PASSPort and related vendor-registration and notice systems

    Publisher
    New York City Mayor's Office of Contract Services
    Data period
    Current procurement platform accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City agency procurement
    Locator
    Vendor enrollment, RFx, award, registration, contract management, and payment workflow
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  26. 26
    Vendor Instructions

    Used for: New York City agency opportunities use PASSPort and related vendor-registration and notice systems

    Publisher
    New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services
    Data period
    Current vendor requirements accessed August 2026
    Scope
    New York City agency procurement
    Locator
    PASSPort enrollment, bidders lists, City Record notices, and approval timing
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  27. 27
    Montefiore Einstein by the Numbers

    Used for: Montefiore Einstein network scale and Bronx campus presence

    Publisher
    Montefiore Einstein
    Data period
    Current institutional figures displayed August 2026
    Scope
    Montefiore Einstein network with major campuses in the Bronx and regional locations
    Locator
    Employees, patients, patient interactions, specialty-care locations, and Bronx campus descriptions
    Source tier
    Tier 2 · recognized institutional research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  28. 28
    Bronx County (The Bronx): Economic & Community Benefit

    Used for: Bronx hospital and health-system economic and employment scale

    Publisher
    Healthcare Association of New York State
    Data period
    Data mainly from 2024 New York hospital cost reports and 2023 regional multipliers
    Scope
    Bronx County hospital and health-system activity
    Locator
    Economic activity, jobs supported, tax dollars, and payroll expenditures
    Source tier
    Tier 2 · recognized institutional research
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026
  29. 29
    171 New 100% Affordable Homes Arrive in the South Bronx
    Publisher
    New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
    Data period
    South Bronx housing conditions cited in 2024
    Scope
    South Bronx
    Locator
    Median rent, household income distribution, and rent-burden statement
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 4, 2026

Before contacting a franchisor

Complete the next layer of due diligence

  • Confirm the exact protected territory and neighboring units.
  • Review the current Franchise Disclosure Document.
  • Validate local staffing, licensing, insurance, and service-base assumptions.
  • Obtain location, vehicle, buildout, or working-capital estimates.
  • Speak with current and former franchisees.
  • Build a candidate-specific financial scenario.

Apply the analysis to your situation

Review how these market findings apply to your budget, role, and proposed territory.

The city score does not include your experience, capital structure, time commitment, financing, or exact territory.

Request a private franchise review
View methodologyView source registry
Disclaimer and broker disclosure: This analysis is informational and does not constitute financial, legal, accounting, or investment advice. Market-alignment scores do not predict financial performance or business success. Offers are made only through the delivery of a Franchise Disclosure Document. We may receive referral compensation from participating franchisors; compensation is not an input to the scoring model.

pipelinefranchises.com

Recently updated pages: Fargo Gulfport Aurora Santa Ana Minneapolis Spokane San Diego Dayton New Orleans Knoxville

Twenty Twenty-Five

Take Free Franchise Match Quiz