Local operating-model alignment analysis

Best Franchise Opportunities We Assessed in San Juan, Puerto Rico

We ranked 14 franchise concepts for San Juan, Puerto Rico using local demand, labor, transportation, real estate, regulation, and source-backed evidence.

What “best” means in this ranking“Best” means the strongest modeled local operating alignment among the franchise concepts assessed on this page. It does not estimate earnings or determine which franchise is best for a particular candidate.
Analysis by Thomas Jepsen, MSc Model: 0.9.0
14Concepts evaluated
21Sources used
15Primary sources
35Local metrics

Evaluation set

Why these concepts were evaluated

This is not a ranking of every franchise that may be offered in the city.

14Concepts assessed

Concepts were included when enough operating-model information existed to assign a provisional local-sensitivity profile. Unresolved inputs reduce confidence or remain conditional rather than automatically excluding a concept.

A brand’s participation in our referral network does not add points or change its position.

City-level conclusions

What stood out in our assessment

Highest category average (limited comparison)Restoration

70.8 average across 2 concepts

Largest positive factorTarget-market demand

0.9 points average among 11 affected concepts

Most assumption-sensitive rankPuroClean

Tested rank range spans 11 positions

Best franchise opportunities assessed

Top 10 local-alignment scores from 14 concepts assessed

“Best” refers to modeled local operating alignment among the concepts assessed—not expected earnings, franchise-system quality, or candidate fit.

Rankings use full-precision scores.Displayed values use one decimal place. Identical displayed scores can therefore have different ranks, and close results should be treated as effectively similar.
RankFranchiseAlignment and tierLargest advantageLargest constraintEvidence confidence
1City WideFacility management
73.1Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+2.3 ptsTarget-market demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
2ActionCOACHBusiness coaching
72.5Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+1.8 ptsTarget-market demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
3FASTSIGNSSigns and graphics
72.4Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+2.0 ptsTarget-market demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
4Jan-Pro InternationalCommercial cleaning
72.2Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment
+2.0 ptsTarget-market demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
5HomeSmilesProperty maintenance services
71.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+1.2 ptsTarget-market demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
6ZOOM DRAINDrain and sewer service
71.2Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.5 ptsReferral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
7Mr. RooterPlumbing
70.9Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.4 ptsProperty replacement-cycle demandNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
8PuroCleanRestoration
70.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.6 ptsReferral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
9Rainbow International RestorationRestoration
70.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.6 ptsReferral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence
10Pillar To Post Home InspectorsHome inspection
70.8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment
+0.4 ptsReferral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustmentModerate evidence confidence

View all 14 score calculations

Original factor comparison

How each factor affected the highest-rated franchise concepts

The graph includes the top 14 concepts by local-alignment score. Only nonzero score contributions are plotted. A factor is removed when every displayed concept received 0.0 points from it. Hover or focus a concept name to highlight all of its remaining data points.

Factor impact among the highest-rated franchise conceptsDiverging dot plot showing nonzero factor score contributions for the top 14 concepts. Zero-point concept-factor pairs are omitted, and factors with no nonzero contributions are excluded.+2.5+1.30.0-1.3-2.5
Target-market demand
#1 City Wide · Target-market demand · +2.3 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Target-market demand · +1.8 pts2#3 FASTSIGNS · Target-market demand · +2.0 pts3#4 Jan-Pro International · Target-market demand · +2.0 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Target-market demand · +1.2 pts5#6 ZOOM DRAIN · Target-market demand · +0.4 pts6#7 Mr. Rooter · Target-market demand · +0.3 pts7#10 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Target-market demand · +0.2 pts10#11 Tiger Adjusters · Target-market demand · +0.3 pts11#12 Aire Serv · Target-market demand · +0.3 pts12#14 Workout Anytime · Target-market demand · -0.6 pts14
Property replacement-cycle demand
#6 ZOOM DRAIN · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.4 pts6#7 Mr. Rooter · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.4 pts7#8 PuroClean · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts8#9 Rainbow International Restoration · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts9#10 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.2 pts10#12 Aire Serv · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts12#13 Mister Sparky Electric · Property replacement-cycle demand · +0.3 pts13
Referral ecosystem
#1 City Wide · Referral ecosystem · +0.8 pts1#2 ActionCOACH · Referral ecosystem · +0.7 pts2#3 FASTSIGNS · Referral ecosystem · +0.4 pts3#4 Jan-Pro International · Referral ecosystem · +0.2 pts4#5 HomeSmiles · Referral ecosystem · +0.6 pts5#6 ZOOM DRAIN · Referral ecosystem · +0.5 pts6#7 Mr. Rooter · Referral ecosystem · +0.2 pts7#8 PuroClean · Referral ecosystem · +0.6 pts8#9 Rainbow International Restoration · Referral ecosystem · +0.6 pts9#10 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors · Referral ecosystem · +0.4 pts10#11 Tiger Adjusters · Referral ecosystem · +0.4 pts11#13 Mister Sparky Electric · Referral ecosystem · +0.1 pts13
Primary source records by factorTarget-market demand: [4] [5] [6] [9] [10] [13] [12]Property replacement-cycle demand: [9] [4] [1] [20] [21] [17]Competitive environment: [5] [6] [9] [3]Labor and staffing friction: [6] [7] [8] [9] [2]Transportation, routing, and parking: [15] [9] [1] [3]Real estate and site feasibility: [11] [12] [9] [19] [16] [1]Sales and customer acquisition: [4] [6] [10] [12] [3]Referral ecosystem: [9] [6] [4] [5]Territory quality: [10] [12] [9] [17] [3] [15]Regulatory and operating friction: [14] [18] [19] [16] [17] [21] [2]
View the chart data as a table
ConceptTarget-market demandProperty replacement-cycle demandReferral ecosystem
#1 City Wide+2.3 pts+0.8 pts
#2 ActionCOACH+1.8 pts+0.7 pts
#3 FASTSIGNS+2.0 pts+0.4 pts
#4 Jan-Pro International+2.0 pts+0.2 pts
#5 HomeSmiles+1.2 pts+0.6 pts
#6 ZOOM DRAIN+0.4 pts+0.4 pts+0.5 pts
#7 Mr. Rooter+0.3 pts+0.4 pts+0.2 pts
#8 PuroClean+0.3 pts+0.6 pts
#9 Rainbow International Restoration+0.3 pts+0.6 pts
#10 Pillar To Post Home Inspectors+0.2 pts+0.2 pts+0.4 pts
#11 Tiger Adjusters+0.3 pts+0.4 pts
#12 Aire Serv+0.3 pts+0.3 pts
#13 Mister Sparky Electric+0.3 pts+0.1 pts
#14 Workout Anytime-0.6 pts

Rank stability

Which positions depend most on individual assumptions?

The line shows the best and worst rank reached when one factor was removed from every concept. A narrow range indicates a more stable position.

#1 City WideModerately sensitive · tested #1–#3
#2 ActionCOACHModerately sensitive · tested #2–#5
#3 FASTSIGNSHighly sensitive · tested #2–#11
#4 Jan-Pro InternationalHighly sensitive · tested #3–#13
#5 HomeSmilesStable · tested #5–#6
#6 ZOOM DRAINModerately sensitive · tested #4–#6
#7 Mr. RooterHighly sensitive · tested #7–#11
#8 PuroCleanHighly sensitive · tested #1–#12
#9 Rainbow International RestorationHighly sensitive · tested #2–#13
#10 Pillar To Post Home InspectorsModerately sensitive · tested #7–#10
#11 Tiger AdjustersHighly sensitive · tested #7–#11
#12 Aire ServHighly sensitive · tested #7–#12
#13 Mister Sparky ElectricHighly sensitive · tested #9–#13
#14 Workout AnytimeStable · tested #14–#14

Neutralizing a factor removes it from every concept. A concept can move down even when its own score improves because competitors may benefit more.

Worked score example

How we calculated City Wide

This example uses the same ledger shown for every concept and must reconcile exactly to the published score.

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.3
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.8
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score73.07
Published local-market alignment73.1

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Starting pointThe operating-model baseline shown in the first ledger row.
InteractionsAny interaction or gate is included in the relevant contribution or calibration row.
Confidence treatmentEvidence confidence is disclosed separately unless the model definition explicitly applies a calibration adjustment.
RoundingFull-precision contributions are summed before the final displayed score is rounded to one decimal place; whole-number results are shown without a trailing decimal.

Interpretation

How to interpret the result

City Wide, ActionCOACH, FASTSIGNS led because their operating requirements captured more of the local support from target-market demand while remaining less exposed to competitive environment. The same city condition can help one operating model and constrain another, so score differences should be read through each concept's factor pattern rather than as a universal franchise-quality verdict. The ordering is most assumption-sensitive for FASTSIGNS, Jan-Pro International, Mr. Rooter; their ranks move more widely when individual factors are neutralized.

Factor impact

Which local conditions changed scores or rankings?

We neutralized one factor at a time, recalculated every score, and then measured both absolute score movement and changes in rank order.

Operating environment54Positive local support

Target-market demand

We tested how much of the city’s theoretical customer and business demand remained usable after operating friction.

We applied a measurable adjustment to 11 of 14 concepts. When we neutralized the factor and recalculated the table, 11 concepts changed position. Jan-Pro International moved from #4 to #13, the largest movement among concepts directly affected by this factor.

Concepts adjusted11 of 14
Average among affected+0.9 pts
Average across all concepts+0.7 pts
Concepts changing rank11

Concepts helped most

City WideFacility management
+2.3 pts
FASTSIGNSSigns and graphics
+2.0 pts
Jan-Pro InternationalCommercial cleaning
+2.0 pts
ActionCOACHBusiness coaching
+1.8 pts
HomeSmilesProperty maintenance services
+1.2 pts

Concepts challenged most

Workout AnytimeFitness
-0.6 pts
Measured but not differentiating in this concept set
  • Competitive environmentNo material score adjustment
  • Labor and staffing frictionNo material score adjustment
  • Transportation, routing, and parkingNo material score adjustment
  • Real estate and site feasibilityNo material score adjustment
  • Sales and customer acquisitionNo material score adjustment
  • Territory qualityNo material score adjustment
  • Regulatory and operating frictionNo material score adjustment

Category comparisons

Best franchise categories we assessed in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Category summaries are shown only when at least two concepts qualified. Two-concept comparisons are explicitly labeled as limited.

Limited two-concept comparison

Best Restoration franchise opportunities we assessed in San Juan, Puerto Rico

70.8

2 Restoration concepts qualified for comparison, with scores ranging from 70.8 to 70.8. PuroClean ranked highest at 70.8. Referral ecosystem added 0.6 points on average among the affected concepts.

Interpret cautiously: A 0.0-point spread is too small to support a strong brand-level conclusion from city alignment alone.

Concepts compared
2
Score range
70.8–70.8
Category average
70.8
PuroClean70.8
Rainbow International Restoration70.8

Compare all assessed concepts

Explore the complete score calculations

14 concepts shown. Expand a concept to see how each factor was treated and the single next check most capable of changing the result.

#1Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment73.1

City Wide

Facility management · B2B facility management and vendor coordination

Increase +2.3 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.3
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.8
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score73.07
Published local-market alignment73.1

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.3 pts
Tested rank range
#1–#3

Most important next check

How many qualified facility and property-management accounts must be reachable for City Wide to support its local contract pipeline?

#2Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.5

ActionCOACH

Business coaching · home-based B2B advisory

Increase +1.8 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+1.8
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.7
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score72.49
Published local-market alignment72.5

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +1.8 pts
Tested rank range
#2–#5

Most important next check

Which business-owner segments are expected to produce the most repeatable coaching demand for ActionCOACH?

#3Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.4

FASTSIGNS

Signs and graphics · B2B production and installation center

Increase +2.0 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.0
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.4
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score72.40
Published local-market alignment72.4

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.0 pts
Tested rank range
#2–#11

Most important next check

Which local customer verticals are expected to generate repeat signage and graphics work for FASTSIGNS?

#4Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.2

Jan-Pro International

Commercial cleaning · recurring commercial route service

Increase +2.0 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+2.0
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.2
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score72.17
Published local-market alignment72.2

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +2.0 pts
Tested rank range
#3–#13

Most important next check

What concentration of recurring commercial accounts is required for Jan-Pro International to build an efficient local book of business?

#5Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment71.8

HomeSmiles

Property maintenance services · Home-based mobile property-maintenance franchise using equipped service vans and technician crews to deliver bundled…

Increase +1.2 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Stable

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+1.2
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.6
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score71.83
Published local-market alignment71.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +1.2 pts
Tested rank range
#5–#6

Most important next check

How many qualified facility and property-management accounts must be reachable for HomeSmiles to support its local contract pipeline?

#6Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment71.2

ZOOM DRAIN

Drain and sewer service · emergency skilled-trade route service

Increase +0.5 pts Referral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.4
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.4
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.5
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score71.25
Published local-market alignment71.2

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Referral ecosystem +0.5 pts
Tested rank range
#4–#6

Most important next check

Where must ZOOM DRAIN stage crews and vehicles to protect after-hours response times across the proposed territory?

#7Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.9

Mr. Rooter

Plumbing · scheduled and emergency skilled-trade service

Increase +0.4 pts Property replacement-cycle demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.3
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.4
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.2
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.87
Published local-market alignment70.9

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Property replacement-cycle demand +0.4 pts
Tested rank range
#7–#11

Most important next check

How many field vehicles must Mr. Rooter deploy, and where would they begin and end each service day?

#8Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.8

PuroClean

Restoration · emergency property restoration

Increase +0.6 pts Referral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demandNot applicable to this operating model
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.6
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.83
Published local-market alignment70.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Referral ecosystem +0.6 pts
Tested rank range
#1–#12

Most important next check

How much secure vehicle and equipment storage does PuroClean require at its operating base?

#9Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.8

Rainbow International Restoration

Restoration · emergency property restoration

Increase +0.6 pts Referral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demandNot applicable to this operating model
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.6
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.82
Published local-market alignment70.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Referral ecosystem +0.6 pts
Tested rank range
#2–#13

Most important next check

How much secure vehicle and equipment storage does Rainbow International Restoration require at its operating base?

#10Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.8

Pillar To Post Home Inspectors

Home inspection · mobile property inspection service

Increase +0.4 pts Referral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Moderately sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.2
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.2
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.4
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.76
Published local-market alignment70.8

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Referral ecosystem +0.4 pts
Tested rank range
#7–#10

Most important next check

Which transaction corridors and referral markets would define Pillar To Post Home Inspectors's practical inspection territory?

#11Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.7

Tiger Adjusters

Public insurance adjusting · Home-based, referral-led public insurance adjusting business combining local property inspections with…

Increase +0.4 pts Referral ecosystemNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.3
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.4
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.70
Published local-market alignment70.7

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Referral ecosystem +0.4 pts
Tested rank range
#7–#11

Most important next check

Which ZIP codes and appointment density assumptions define Tiger Adjusters's practical service territory?

#12Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.7

Aire Serv

HVAC installation, repair, and maintenance · Manager-led mobile HVAC installation, repair, maintenance, and emergency service business using skilled technicians…

Increase +0.3 pts Target-market demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand+0.3
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot applicable to this operating model
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.68
Published local-market alignment70.7

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Adequate
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand +0.3 pts
Tested rank range
#7–#12

Most important next check

How much secure vehicle and equipment storage does Aire Serv require at its operating base?

#13Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment70.4

Mister Sparky Electric

Electrical · skilled-trade home service

Increase +0.3 pts Property replacement-cycle demandNo material negative local adjustment identified

Rank sensitivity: Highly sensitive

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demandNot applicable to this operating model
Property replacement-cycle demand+0.3
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystem+0.1
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score70.45
Published local-market alignment70.4

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Property replacement-cycle demand +0.3 pts
Tested rank range
#9–#13

Most important next check

What daily vehicle utilization and travel-time allowance are built into Mister Sparky Electric's operating plan?

#14Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment69.4

Workout Anytime

Fitness · fixed-location membership fitness

No material positive local adjustment identifiedReduction -0.6 pts Target-market demand

Rank sensitivity: Stable

How we scored this concept

Full score ledger

Every factor is classified so a displayed zero is not confused with missing, conditional, or non-applicable evidence.

Neutral model baseline70.0
Target-market demand-0.6
Property replacement-cycle demandNot applicable to this operating model
Competitive environmentNot included in the score
Labor and staffing frictionMeasured; no meaningful local adjustment
Transportation, routing, and parkingDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Real estate and site feasibilityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Sales and customer acquisitionNot included in the score
Referral ecosystemNot applicable to this operating model
Territory qualityDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Regulatory and operating frictionDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating condition
Full-precision calculated score69.43
Published local-market alignment69.4

Factor calculations use full precision. Contributions and published scores are displayed to one decimal place; ranking order uses the full-precision score.

Evidence confidence

City Modifier Evidence
Adequate
Factor Research Coverage
Strong
Franchise-profile completeness
Limited
Source-evidence confidence
Strong
Geographic applicability
Adequate
Overall evidence confidence
Moderate evidence confidence
Largest absolute effect
Target-market demand -0.6 pts
Tested rank range
#14–#14

Most important next check

What trade-area boundary and population base would Workout Anytime use to evaluate the proposed location?

Metric registry

The 35 local metrics behind this analysis

The registry exposes the raw value, period, geography, factor mapping, and source for every public metric used in the city research.

View all local metrics
MetricRaw valuePeriodGeographyHow usedSource
Resident population estimate in 2024332,454people2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Territory quality [4]
Population change from the 2020 estimate base to 2024-2.9percent2023 County Business Patterns and 2022 economic measures where displayedSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Territory quality [5]
Population density in 20246,942.6people per square mile2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Territory quality [4]
Estimated households in 2024146,279households2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand [4]
Estimated housing units in 2024202,066housing units2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Property replacement-cycle demand, Territory quality [4]
Median household income in 202430,447usd per year2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand [4]
Population below the poverty threshold in 202434.6percent of population2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand [4]
Population age 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher40.3percent2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimatesSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Referral ecosystem, Labor and staffing friction [4]
Population age 65 and older in the 2019-2023 PRCS profileage 65 plus: 83,949; total population: 338,661people2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand [9]
Covered establishments in fourth quarter 202512,250establishmentsFourth quarter and December 2025San Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Referral ecosystem [6]
Covered employment in December 2025259,210jobsFourth quarter and December 2025San Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Referral ecosystem, Labor and staffing friction [6]
Covered employment change from December 2024 to December 2025-2.1percentFourth quarter and December 2025San Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Labor and staffing friction [6]
Average weekly wage in fourth quarter 2025889usd per weekFourth quarter and December 2025San Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Labor and staffing friction [6]
Selected establishment and employment counts in the 2022 Economic Census tablefinance and insurance: establishments: 768, employment: 23,865; healthcare and social assistance: establishments: 1,583, employment: 19,965; professional scientific and technical services: establishments: 2,618, employment: 18,241; administrative support and waste management: establishments: 592, employment: 27,457; accommodation and food services: establishments: 1,178, employment: 20,862; construction: establishments: 448, employment: 7,765establishments and jobs2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Target-market demand, Referral ecosystem, Labor and staffing friction [9]
Cruise passengers recorded during the November 2025-April 2026 high season1,360,937passengersNovember 2025 through April 2026Old San Juan cruise portEvidence for Target-market demand, Territory quality [10]
Homeport cruise passengers during the November 2025-April 2026 high season371,536passengersNovember 2025 through April 2026San Juan homeport cruise operationsEvidence for Target-market demand, Territory quality [10]
Housing stock and occupancy in the 2019-2023 PRCS profiletotal units: 193,011; occupied units: 147,795; vacant units: 45,216housing units2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Property replacement-cycle demand, Territory quality, Target-market demand [9]
Housing stock and occupancy in Santurcetotal units: 45,358; occupied units: 31,286; vacant units: 14,072housing units2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSanturce, San JuanEvidence for Territory quality, Target-market demand, Real estate and site feasibility [9]
Modeled structure counts by flood-risk categorynone: 71,556; slight: 4,415; moderate: 10,886; very strong: 30structures2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Property replacement-cycle demand, Real estate and site feasibility, Territory quality, Regulatory and operating friction [9]
Municipal draft plan identifies storm-surge and coastal-flood exposure in Condado and Ocean ParkCondado, Ocean Parknamed submarkets2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingCondado and Ocean Park, San JuanEvidence for Territory quality, Real estate and site feasibility, Property replacement-cycle demand, Regulatory and operating friction [9]
Preliminary unemployment rate in May 20264.5percentLabor-force data through May 2026 and nonfarm employment through June 2026, preliminarySan Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metropolitan areaEvidence for Labor and staffing friction [8]
Preliminary total nonfarm employment in June 2026681,600jobsLabor-force data through May 2026 and nonfarm employment through June 2026, preliminarySan Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metropolitan areaEvidence for Target-market demand, Labor and staffing friction [8]
Mean hourly wages for selected franchise-relevant major occupation groupsall occupations: 17.98; building and grounds cleaning and maintenance: 11.73; food preparation and serving: 12.14; sales and related: 13.96; office and administrative support: 15.02; construction and extraction: 13.75; installation maintenance and repair: 15.25; transportation and material moving: 13.3usd per hourMay 2024San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metropolitan areaEvidence for Labor and staffing friction [7]
San Juan industrial vacancy and asking rents in the second half of 2025vacancy rate: 3.3; asking rent min: 9; asking rent max: 15.5; asking rent average: 12; predevelopment pipeline sqft: 2,250,000percent and usd per square foot per yearSecond half of 2025San Juan industrial marketEvidence for Real estate and site feasibility [11]
San Juan Metro office vacancy in the first half of 202626.5percentFirst half of 2026San Juan metropolitan office marketEvidence for Real estate and site feasibility, Territory quality, Target-market demand [12]
Office landlords were reported to offer greater concessions and flexible termination structuresexpanded concessions and shorter effective commitmentsqualitative conditionFirst half of 2026San Juan metropolitan office marketEvidence for Real estate and site feasibility, Territory quality [12]
Affordable and available rental homes per 100 extremely low-income renter households65homes per 100 eli renter households2023 Puerto Rican Community SurveySan Juan metropolitan areaEvidence for Target-market demand, Labor and staffing friction [13]
Municipal patent rate schedule for nonfinancial businessesgross income 5000 01 to 12500: exempt; gross income 12500 01 to 100000: 25; gross income 100000 01 to 300000 rate percent: 0.2; gross income over 300000 rate percent: 0.5; financial business rate percent: 1.5usd and percent of attributable business volumeCode revision dated April 24, 2023Municipio Autónomo de San JuanEvidence for Regulatory and operating friction [14] [2]
Historic resources in the Old San Juan historic districttotal resources: 917; contributing resources: 798; san juan historic site resources: 84resourcesHistoric-resource inventory through May 2024Old San Juan historic district and San Juan Historic SiteEvidence for Regulatory and operating friction, Territory quality, Property replacement-cycle demand [17]
The approved long-range plan identifies the San Juan TMA as Puerto Rico's most complex highway and multimodal transportation system and its main freight and passenger gatewaymost complex highway and multimodal system main gatewayqualitative conditionApproved 2050 long-range plan accessed August 2026San Juan Transportation Management AreaEvidence for Transportation, routing, and parking, Territory quality [15]
Municipal Línea de San Juan bus service was operating ten routes10routes2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modelingSan Juan Municipio, Puerto RicoEvidence for Transportation, routing, and parking [9]
A new business in an existing location generally requires a Permiso Único and parcel-use verification; construction and remodeling require licensed professional processingexisting location new business: parcel use verification, applicable licenses, permiso unico; construction or remodeling: licensed architect or engineer, construction permitworkflow requirementsCurrent permit workflow accessed August 2026Puerto Rico, including San Juan subject to applicable authorityEvidence for Regulatory and operating friction, Real estate and site feasibility [19] [18]
Puerto Rico planning programs include designated historic zones, tourism-interest zones, and a coastal-zone management frameworkhistoric zones, tourism interest zones, coastal zone managementprogramsCurrent program framework accessed August 2026Puerto Rico, with mapped applicability in San JuanEvidence for Regulatory and operating friction, Territory quality, Real estate and site feasibility [16]
High temperature and humidity can accelerate corrosion and deterioration of reinforced-concrete and steel infrastructure in coastal environmentstemperature and humidity accelerate corrosionqualitative engineering mechanismCoastal infrastructure deterioration modeling through 2100United States coastal counties; applied only as mechanism corroboration for San JuanEvidence for Property replacement-cycle demand, Labor and staffing friction [20] [1]
The Puerto Rico Construction Code 2018 is listed as an applicable construction regulationPuerto Rico Construction Code 2018code2018 Puerto Rico Construction Code, current listing accessed August 2026Puerto Rico, including San JuanEvidence for Regulatory and operating friction, Property replacement-cycle demand [21]

How to use the ranking

What the model can and cannot establish

  • Scores measure local operating alignment, not expected financial performance or franchise-system quality.
  • Citywide evidence may not describe the exact site or territory ultimately offered.
  • Conditional effects are shown for diligence but do not change the published score until their applicability is established.

Methodology

How the local-alignment ranking is calculated

01

Measure the city

Collect reusable local metrics with source, period, geography, and confidence fields.

02

Profile each operating model

Map each franchise to controlled operating attributes and local sensitivities.

03

Apply scoreable effects

Score only effects that apply without an unresolved site, territory, customer, or project gate.

04

Preserve conditional effects

Keep location- or territory-dependent issues visible for diligence without automatically changing the score.

05

Test rank sensitivity

Remove one factor at a time from every concept and rerank using full-precision scores.

06

Generate public output

Create the ranking, factor-status ledger, visuals, metric registry, and automated quality report from the same data.

Why every concept begins at 70.0

70.0 is a neutral display baseline shared by every concept. Local conditions can move a score by no more than 18.0 points in either direction under the current model. It is not a percentage, probability, or estimate of investment quality.

Precision and materiality

Calculations use full-precision values. Published scores and factor contributions display one decimal place, while ranks use full precision. Effects smaller than 0.1 points are identified as below the publication threshold rather than presented as a meaningful zero.

Score tiers

Tier 1 · Strongest modeled alignment80.0–100.0
Tier 2 · Favorable modeled alignment72.0–80.0
Tier 3 · Mixed modeled alignment64.0–72.0
Tier 4 · Higher-friction modeled alignment0.0–64.0

How factor rows are classified

Positive local adjustmentNegative local adjustmentMeasured; no meaningful local adjustmentEffect below the publication thresholdNot applicable to this operating modelDepends on the specific site, territory, or operating conditionNot included in the score
What “best” means here

“Best” means the strongest modeled local operating alignment among the franchise concepts assessed on this page.

Model 0.9.0 · Compiler 0.9.10-nonzero-markers-only · Analysis updated August 5, 2026

Model governance

How this report is calculated and corrected

Calculation controls

Model designer
Thomas Jepsen

No concept’s final score is manually raised or lowered after calculation. Before this template is activated, the report is reviewed for source scope, classification, arithmetic, unsupported claims, duplication, and readability.

Model history

  1. Model 0.9.0-calibration · August 4, 2026Added conditional scoring gates, factor-status transparency, rank-sensitivity testing, metric registry output, and factor-impact visualization data.

Corrections policy

Corrected source, geography, or operating-profile evidence triggers a full compiler rerun so every dependent score and visual is recalculated.

Source registry

Evidence represented in this report

Each source identifies its period, scope, and the local metrics it supports. Internal or supplied research is not presented as independently accessible evidence.

  1. 1
    The Utility Delta: A Structural Audit of Ten U.S. MarketsInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.

    Used for: High temperature and humidity can accelerate corrosion and deterioration of reinforced-concrete and steel infrastructure in coastal environments

    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    San Juan section reviewed August 2, 2026; underlying cited dates vary
    Scope
    San Juan, Puerto Rico section within a multi-city research docket
    Locator
    San Juan section, paragraphs 117-126
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  2. 2
    Structural Constraints and Hidden Costs: A Forensic Municipal AuditInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.

    Used for: Municipal patent rate schedule for nonfinancial businesses

    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    San Juan section reviewed August 2, 2026; underlying cited dates vary
    Scope
    San Juan, Puerto Rico section within a multi-city municipal docket
    Locator
    San Juan section, paragraphs 72-79
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  3. 3
    Franchise data - 2 - riverside through charlotte.csvInternal or supplied research; not publicly accessible.
    Publisher
    Supplied research material
    Data period
    Undated supplied neighborhood records reviewed August 2, 2026
    Scope
    Condado, Miramar, Hato Rey, Río Piedras, Old San Juan, and Ocean Park records
    Locator
    Rows where city equals San Juan and state_name equals Puerto Rico
    Source tier
    Tier 5 · supplied bespoke research
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  4. 4
    San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico Profile

    Used for: Resident population estimate in 2024, Population density in 2024, Estimated households in 2024, Estimated housing units in 2024, and Median household income in 2024

    Publisher
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Data period
    2024 Puerto Rico Community Survey 1-year estimates
    Scope
    San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico
    Locator
    Population, density, income, poverty, education, households, and housing sections
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  5. 5
    QuickFacts: San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico

    Used for: Population change from the 2020 estimate base to 2024

    Publisher
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Published
    May 14, 2026
    Data period
    2023 County Business Patterns and 2022 economic measures where displayed
    Scope
    San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico
    Locator
    Employer establishments, employment, payroll, receipts, and sales rows
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  6. 6
    Municipio Employment and Wages in Puerto Rico — Fourth Quarter 2025

    Used for: Covered establishments in fourth quarter 2025, Covered employment in December 2025, Covered employment change from December 2024 to December 2025, and Average weekly wage in fourth quarter 2025

    Publisher
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Published
    June 12, 2026
    Data period
    Fourth quarter and December 2025
    Scope
    San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico
    Locator
    Table 1 and Table 2, San Juan row
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  7. 7
    Occupational Employment and Wages in San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas — May 2024

    Used for: Mean hourly wages for selected franchise-relevant major occupation groups

    Publisher
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Published
    April 29, 2025
    Data period
    May 2024
    Scope
    San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metropolitan statistical area
    Locator
    Table A major occupational groups and technical note
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  8. 8
    San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Economy at a Glance

    Used for: Preliminary unemployment rate in May 2026 and Preliminary total nonfarm employment in June 2026

    Publisher
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Published
    July 1, 2026
    Data period
    Labor-force data through May 2026 and nonfarm employment through June 2026, preliminary
    Scope
    San Juan-Bayamón-Caguas metropolitan statistical area
    Locator
    Economy at a Glance table
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  9. 9
    Plan de Mitigación Contra Peligros Naturales Municipio de San Juan 2026 — Borrador

    Used for: Population age 65 and older in the 2019-2023 PRCS profile, Selected establishment and employment counts in the 2022 Economic Census table, Housing stock and occupancy in the 2019-2023 PRCS profile, Housing stock and occupancy in Santurce, and Modeled structure counts by flood-risk category

    Publisher
    Municipio Autónomo de San Juan
    Published
    February 16, 2026
    Data period
    2020 Census; 2019-2023 PRCS; 2022 Economic Census; 2026 hazard modeling
    Scope
    San Juan Municipio, with barrio and subbarrio detail
    Locator
    Pages 106-122, 487, 619, and 637-638
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government draft
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  10. 10
    Compañía de Turismo de Puerto Rico destaca cierre exitoso de la temporada alta de cruceros con aumento de 43% en pasajeros

    Used for: Cruise passengers recorded during the November 2025-April 2026 high season and Homeport cruise passengers during the November 2025-April 2026 high season

    Publisher
    Puerto Rico Tourism Company
    Published
    May 29, 2026
    Data period
    November 2025 through April 2026
    Scope
    Old San Juan cruise port and Puerto Rico cruise operations
    Locator
    Passenger totals, operations, seasonality, and homeport section
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  11. 11
    Puerto Rico Industrial - 2H 2025

    Used for: San Juan industrial vacancy and asking rents in the second half of 2025

    Publisher
    JLL
    Published
    November 26, 2025
    Data period
    Second half of 2025
    Scope
    San Juan industrial market and Toa Baja-to-Carolina development corridor
    Locator
    Vacancy, asking rent, scarcity, and pre-development pipeline summary
    Source tier
    Tier 3 · credible industry
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  12. 12
    Office Report (San Juan Metro) - 1H 2026

    Used for: San Juan Metro office vacancy in the first half of 2026 and Office landlords were reported to offer greater concessions and flexible termination structures

    Publisher
    JLL
    Published
    May 29, 2026
    Data period
    First half of 2026
    Scope
    San Juan metropolitan office market
    Locator
    Vacancy, downsizing, lease flexibility, and concessions summary
    Source tier
    Tier 3 · credible industry
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  13. 13
    The Gap: Assessing the Affordability and Availability of Rental Housing in Puerto Rico

    Used for: Affordable and available rental homes per 100 extremely low-income renter households

    Publisher
    National Low Income Housing Coalition
    Published
    November 20, 2025
    Data period
    2023 Puerto Rican Community Survey
    Scope
    Puerto Rico and San Juan metropolitan area
    Locator
    San Juan metropolitan affordable-and-available rental-home finding
    Source tier
    Tier 2 · recognized institutional research
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  14. 14
    Código de Desarrollo Económico del Municipio Autónomo de San Juan

    Used for: Municipal patent rate schedule for nonfinancial businesses

    Publisher
    Municipio Autónomo de San Juan / Oficina de Gerencia y Presupuesto de Puerto Rico
    Published
    April 24, 2023
    Data period
    Code revision dated April 24, 2023
    Scope
    Municipio Autónomo de San Juan
    Locator
    Article 2.01, municipal patent rates and thresholds, pages 14-15
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  15. 15
    2050 Multimodal Long Range Transportation Plan — San Juan Transportation Management Area

    Used for: The approved long-range plan identifies the San Juan TMA as Puerto Rico's most complex highway and multimodal transportation system and its main freight and passenger gateway

    Publisher
    Puerto Rico Department of Transportation and Public Works / Metropolitan Planning Organization
    Data period
    Approved 2050 long-range plan accessed August 2026
    Scope
    San Juan Transportation Management Area
    Locator
    San Juan TMA system complexity, freight entry, transit, and congestion summary
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  16. 16
    Programa de Planificación Física

    Used for: Puerto Rico planning programs include designated historic zones, tourism-interest zones, and a coastal-zone management framework

    Publisher
    Puerto Rico Planning Board
    Data period
    Current program framework accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Puerto Rico historic zones, tourist-interest zones, and coastal-zone program
    Locator
    Historic zones, tourism zones, and coastal-zone program sections
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  17. 17
    Conservación Histórica

    Used for: Historic resources in the Old San Juan historic district

    Publisher
    Oficina Estatal de Conservación Histórica de Puerto Rico
    Data period
    Historic-resource inventory through May 2024
    Scope
    Puerto Rico, including Old San Juan historic district and San Juan Historic Site
    Locator
    Historic-district inventory list
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  18. 18
    Reglamento Núm. 41 — Reglamento Conjunto para la Evaluación y Expedición de Permisos Relacionados al Desarrollo, Uso de Terrenos y Operación de Negocios

    Used for: A new business in an existing location generally requires a Permiso Único and parcel-use verification; construction and remodeling require licensed professional processing

    Publisher
    Puerto Rico Planning Board
    Published
    June 16, 2023
    Data period
    Current emergency joint regulation framework accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Puerto Rico, including San Juan subject to applicable municipal hierarchy and mapped districts
    Locator
    Regulation title and current effective framework
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  19. 19
    OGPe — Oficina de Gerencia de Permisos

    Used for: A new business in an existing location generally requires a Permiso Único and parcel-use verification; construction and remodeling require licensed professional processing

    Publisher
    Puerto Rico Office of Permit Management
    Data period
    Current permit workflow accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Puerto Rico, including San Juan where OGPe or municipal permitting authority applies
    Locator
    New business, use change, unique permit, construction, and remodeling workflows
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  20. 20
    Projections of corrosion and deterioration of infrastructure in United States coasts under a changing climate

    Used for: High temperature and humidity can accelerate corrosion and deterioration of reinforced-concrete and steel infrastructure in coastal environments

    Publisher
    National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Published
    April 30, 2022
    Data period
    Coastal infrastructure deterioration modeling through 2100
    Scope
    United States coastal counties; mechanism used as general engineering corroboration, not a San Juan condition estimate
    Locator
    Abstract and coastal corrosion mechanism
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government research
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026
  21. 21
    Reglamentos — Código Construcción de Puerto Rico 2018

    Used for: The Puerto Rico Construction Code 2018 is listed as an applicable construction regulation

    Publisher
    Negociado del Cuerpo de Bomberos de Puerto Rico
    Data period
    2018 Puerto Rico Construction Code, current listing accessed August 2026
    Scope
    Puerto Rico, including San Juan
    Locator
    Regulations list, Puerto Rico Construction Code 2018
    Source tier
    Tier 1 · government
    Accessed
    August 2, 2026

Before contacting a franchisor

Complete the next layer of due diligence

  • Confirm the exact protected territory and neighboring units.
  • Review the current Franchise Disclosure Document.
  • Validate local staffing, licensing, insurance, and service-base assumptions.
  • Obtain location, vehicle, buildout, or working-capital estimates.
  • Speak with current and former franchisees.
  • Build a candidate-specific financial scenario.

Apply the analysis to your situation

Review how these market findings apply to your budget, role, and proposed territory.

The city score does not include your experience, capital structure, time commitment, financing, or exact territory.

Request a private franchise review
View methodologyView source registry

Twenty Twenty-Five

Take Free Franchise Match Quiz